You guys are confusing safety with surveillance because of the obvious clickbaity title of the article.
Having the option to know where your children are is not the same as controlling them. Parent intent matters and any tool can be abused, which doesn’t mean the tool is wrong.
You’re teaching your children to accept highly invasive surveillance. And for what? Just so you can surrender to a moral panic about stranger danger, when actual rates of childhood abduction and abuse are at historic lows. You’re failing to properly raise citizens of a healthy democratic society. Instead, you’re raising children to accept living in an authoritarian society. If kids grow up with their own parents spying on them, why would they ever think the government and corporations spying on them is wrong? You surrendered the freedom of your own children, just to give in to your own irrational insecurities. But you tell yourself that your case is different, that you’re violating their privacy for their own good. This is exactly what every authoritarian government tells their citizens. It’s for your own good; that’s what they always say. You are failing to teach your children to have the values necessary to be citizens in a healthy democracy.
The road to Hell is paved with “for the children.”
when actual rates of childhood abduction and abuse are at historic lows.
So you’re saying that parents are more cautious than ever, and childhood abduction rates are at an all time low, and you don’t think maybe those two things are related?
Do you also think we should stop vaccinations when the diseases they protect against are at historic lows?
Besides which, the overall rate of child abductions only matters if we’re talking about the measures that society should take.
On a personal level, if my child got abducted and I didn’t do everything in my power to prevent that, I doubt I’d be comforted by the knowledge that it was extremely unlikely to have happened. I wouldn’t walk into my child’s empty bedroom and say to my grieving wife, “Man, what were the odds?”
I don’t want to actively track their every move because I’m not a psycho, but there’s no downside to giving myself the ability to find them in an emergency.
You’re thinking wrong.
You guys are confusing safety with surveillance because of the obvious clickbaity title of the article.
Having the option to know where your children are is not the same as controlling them. Parent intent matters and any tool can be abused, which doesn’t mean the tool is wrong.
You’re teaching your children to accept highly invasive surveillance. And for what? Just so you can surrender to a moral panic about stranger danger, when actual rates of childhood abduction and abuse are at historic lows. You’re failing to properly raise citizens of a healthy democratic society. Instead, you’re raising children to accept living in an authoritarian society. If kids grow up with their own parents spying on them, why would they ever think the government and corporations spying on them is wrong? You surrendered the freedom of your own children, just to give in to your own irrational insecurities. But you tell yourself that your case is different, that you’re violating their privacy for their own good. This is exactly what every authoritarian government tells their citizens. It’s for your own good; that’s what they always say. You are failing to teach your children to have the values necessary to be citizens in a healthy democracy.
The road to Hell is paved with “for the children.”
So you’re saying that parents are more cautious than ever, and childhood abduction rates are at an all time low, and you don’t think maybe those two things are related?
Do you also think we should stop vaccinations when the diseases they protect against are at historic lows?
Besides which, the overall rate of child abductions only matters if we’re talking about the measures that society should take.
On a personal level, if my child got abducted and I didn’t do everything in my power to prevent that, I doubt I’d be comforted by the knowledge that it was extremely unlikely to have happened. I wouldn’t walk into my child’s empty bedroom and say to my grieving wife, “Man, what were the odds?”
I don’t want to actively track their every move because I’m not a psycho, but there’s no downside to giving myself the ability to find them in an emergency.
They’re AirTags in shoes, dude. Kids aren’t learning to submit to authoritarians because of Sketchers, they’re just finding their shoes faster.
And that’s what the proles told each other about telescreens.
“It’s just a telescreen dood, just chill.”