So basically their journalists are cleared for using a tool that gives off radioactive levels of mutated LinkedIn-speak (not X but Y!), and in the best case scenario they think the proximity to these tools won’t leech into the style of their own writing?
And that’s at the very best of circumstances. Just a little toxicity in the article contents.
They lost an editor who used fake AI quotes before this new explicit allowance.
So basically their journalists are cleared for using a tool that gives off radioactive levels of mutated LinkedIn-speak (not X but Y!), and in the best case scenario they think the proximity to these tools won’t leech into the style of their own writing?
And that’s at the very best of circumstances. Just a little toxicity in the article contents.
They lost an editor who used fake AI quotes before this new explicit allowance.