• TehPers@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’ve read tamer media that would still qualify as questionable. I think the real question is whether something is “NSFW” if it’s written media rather than visual since it’s unlikely a colleague is reading your book.

    That being the case, F-Droid has its own definition for NSFW, and no reasonable definition of NSFW that doesn’t specifically exclude written media or religious texts would exclude the Bible (or any Abrahamic religious text, really). It’s more that those books get a pass for historical reasons than anything else.

    • skarn@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      As I wrote above, noone where I work would blink for that kind of stuff, but I guess that doepends on the local culture.

      I have looked and couldn’t find the F-Droid definition of NSFW.

      But I’ve bit bits of the discussion and the whole thing was kinda nuts. By my criterion I’d let the Bible pass, but the way all those people jumped to “So ArE yOu BaNnInG tHe QuRaN aS wElL??!!?” was really embarassing.