• IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    They’re a solution in search of a problem. Renewables and storage costs are so low that there’s no business case for new nuclear, let alone the even more expensive SMRs.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The rapidly dropping cost of wind and solar has definitely tanked a lot of nuclear projects. The cost-benefit analysis done during the planning of a new nuclear plant is usually completely underwater 5 years later.

      However, there are some areas where there isn’t enough open ground for wind or solar installations, and nuclear would be a good option for replacing existing fossil fuel plants. Small modular reactors would be great for dense urban areas that are still supported by natural gas plants.