You must log in or register to comment.
It reported a $104 billion net loss during the period, though most of that was due to the change in fair value of convertible notes and derivative liabilities.
It’s just accounting bullshit. Sensationalist headline, but a nothingburger.
GAAP metrics like “net loss” are sensationalist, what a claim lol. These are the only numbers that can’t be bullshitted.
Nothing to see here, please return your attention to Annualised Run Rate that we extrapolated out of 15 seconds at the end of February.
The overwhelming majority of the deficit—$94 billion of the $104 billion—comes from a non-cash accounting adjustment. Early investors like Amazon and Google backed Anthropic using convertible notes (debt that turns into equity). Because Anthropic’s estimated valuation skyrocketed toward $1.5T–$2T ahead of its IPO, accounting rules (GAAP) require the company to recalculate the “fair value” of those liabilities. In short: Anthropic looks deep in the red because the company became massively more valuable.
Manageable Operational Losses: When you strip out the funky non-cash accounting charges, Anthropic’s actual nine-month operating loss was only $1.26 billion. For a tech giant scaling this fast, an operating deficit of that size is well within normal territory.
In essence, their actual operational losses, the ones that determine if we get to celebrate them closing down, are literally 1% of the headline.
This is real money, hence it’s included in net PnL. All real companies have to count money like this for a reason. Isn’t Anthropic a real company?
No, it’s not real money. In this case, convertable notes are loans backed by stock. That’s why the debt is valued so highly. The notes are still for the same amount of stock, but the value of that stock is inflated beyond reason. Either way, Anthropic is not on the hook for the cash value of the stock, just the stock itself.
This debt is essentially noting that Anthropic does not own all of this stock on their books, but converting it into cash-value to do so. If someone were to buy the company, like via an IPO, it would be important for them to understand how much of the comapny’s valuation is actually owned by the company vs other entities.
It is literally not real money. It is the value of shares that anthropic owes to its lenders. In the event its market value crashes, so does the majority of that debt.
These notes can eventually convert into company shares. Anthropic’s valuation increases dramatically. The value of the investors’ conversion rights increases too. Accounting rules require Anthropic to recognise that increase as an expense. In other words, Anthropic’s rising valuation can actually create a reported accounting loss. An important distinction: This is not necessarily money leaving Anthropic’s bank account. It is a non-cash accounting adjustment reflecting the increased value of financial obligations tied to future shares. Think of it this way: You borrow money and agree that the lender can convert the debt into shares in your business. Your business becomes much more valuable. Those conversion rights become more valuable to the lender. You now have a larger accounting liability, even though you haven’t paid the lender anything extra in cash. That’s broadly what happened.
So derivative instruments are not real? You need to tell that to Lehman Brothers accountants. You could have prevented 2008 GFC! xD
I’ve been providing actual information. Would you care to explain why this is a bad thing for anthropic and how this might lead to their bankruptcy? Or are we just here to echo chamber?
I think things are bad because Anthropic posted an over 100bn net loss per GAAP accounting standards. I think GAAP is cool because if you lie about anything that GAAP covers you go to jail. But maybe accountants didn’t know what they were doing when they agreeing upon those rules. Idk, man, maybe this company is just wildly unprofitable and the biggest missalocation of resources in the history of mankind?
Yeah but it’s an AI company.
AI you hear!!!
The more an AI company loses, the more valuable the company.
Well, the higher the valuation, which is not the same as value. But nevermind that small detail…In this particular case, here’s a company that’s bleeding cash faster than Alexei Romanov juggling box cutters with boxing gloves, and it’s valued at… wait for it… $2tn 🥁
It would be hilarious if those fuckers didn’t set themselves up to crash everybody’s 401k’s with them…
