Seems fine. It’s common to mention notable things about people like this.
Example: https://variety.com/2025/music/news/lord-buffalo-drummer-detained-by-border-patrol-1236397990/
Yeah, cornhole is pretty obscure as a pro sport but it’s still noteworthy.
Nice.
Yeah… the difference is that one (sparrows) was just a bad idea due to a total misunderstanding of the problem. The sparrows weren’t the pests, the bugs they eat were.
The other (one child) is a good idea that was poorly managed due to unexpected cultural mores. Even so it would still be effective once people are “incentivized” to give up on the foolishness of prioritizing one sex over the other.
The one child policy really gonna be up there with killing all the sparrows long term…
Except that killing the sparrows was a bad idea.
That’s a sensible reason but these people appear to be just that stupid and petty.
You don’t need to benefit to still have it better than the people it was stolen from.
Someone else getting knocked down leaves them worse off even if it doesn’t improve your situation.
I’m pretty sure the OP was being facetious to suggest Latin.
Not all of them have MRI machines, and regardless of its cheaper than repairing them.
That would not cost billions. Not even close. It would certainly be far cheaper than the cost of repair.
Yeah but enough people would.
Yeah but this is the US.
You think we’ll be using trains?
That’s fine.
In that case you can feel free to ignore the US-specific portion and go back to the first “no, they are synonyms” statement.
No but yes but no.
I’m not sure you are serious/genuine here but I’m also not sure you deserve the downvotes and I have some time to kill.
“Republic” is “rule by the people” (Rex public). It means the same as democracy (“people rule”). The only difference is Latin vs Greek.
As used in the US, your description kinda-sorta covers the principles that the parties once maybe kinda stood for 150 years ago or so. (Something like “more federal power / less federal power”).
In reality these days they’re just labels for two different groups, and the words have no connection in this context, it’s just an historical note.
The war exists because Russia invaded. You can’t have a “peace agenda” or “conditions for peace” until someone started a war in the first place, and that was Russia.
US only instigated this war to weaken Russia
Well, that’s certainly a perspective.
Really unclear how the US forced Russia to invade, you’ll have to explain that part I think.
They’re all wasted, does it matter if it’s “fluff” or not?