

It’s not about what happens to the body, if it was “bring us your dead pets we will feed them to tigers”, I wouldn’t be against it. I fundamentally disagree with the idea of surrendering your pet to be killed, be it a kill-shelter, or a zoo.
It’s not about what happens to the body, if it was “bring us your dead pets we will feed them to tigers”, I wouldn’t be against it. I fundamentally disagree with the idea of surrendering your pet to be killed, be it a kill-shelter, or a zoo.
It’s a bit less about what happens to the body - that I don’t give a shit about - it’s about what happens to the live creature. It’s not about accepting your dead pets, it’s about accepting your alive pets to be killed, and I fundamentally don’t like that, no matter will they kill them and fed the corpses to tigers, or burn it like kill shelters do.
The comparable situation would be if your family grew tired of you, and some day decide to euthanize you and feed to tigers.
To which your answer is probably “well, I’m a human, you can’t do this to me, I don’t want to be killed against my will”, and we will be back to square one.
Alternatively, you’re too good at separating humans and animals on emotional level, to the extreme degree.
on things that actually happend.
The thing you’re saying didn’t happen literally happen, what are you talking about?
We should’ve stop doing it before he got into the office. Now his ramblings are interpreted by his followers as laws, so you have to pay the most attention possible to it. For your own safety, and for the safety of others.
You’re participating in the old good tradition of sanewashing what Trump said. You don’t need to interpret that jumble of sounds as charitably as possible, he doesn’t deserve it, and he repeatedly showed that he actually means the worst most of the time. He said “nazis showed signs of love to holocaust victims” with his own stupid mouth. You don’t need to excuse him by interpreting it as if he didn’t say it.
They don’t feed diseased animals to the tigers