• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 17th, 2025

help-circle

  • You’re not wrong, but you’re not thinking like a shithead DA.

    Rat poison was taken from the floor and added to the food of a police officer. We don’t know who exactly did it, but everyone in the kitchen could reasonably have known it was happening and did nothing to stop it, and therefore is guilty of felony murder.

    Again, the DA doesn’t need to be right, they just need to convince a grand jury that there’s a chance they’re right, then they force the accused in to a plea deal. Because these are kitchen guys, they don’t make much money, so they’ll be using a public defender who will likely tell them they’re going to prison, and the best thing they can do is plea out.


  • Evil is a nebulous term that can be applied by anyone to anything.

    Similarly, calling them vile disgusting filth doesn’t work, as it could be used by members of ICE to describe the innocent men women and children they abuse.

    We need a term that satisfies several criteria.

    It must be true, in so far that it is inarguably applicable to any member of ICE.

    It must be understandable at a 5th grade reading level, because this is America and that’s as good as most of his supporters can manage.

    And it must not be applicable to the victims. Therefore the term cannot be purely emotional. But evoking an emotional response is kind of the goal.

    Idk how about Genocide Squads?


  • Realistically, all of them would be considered guilty of the crime by simply being in the kitchen when it happened.

    A conviction hungry DA would use the same laws that apply murder charges to the guy who drove the car. If it happened, and you could have theoretically known it was going to happen, and you still participated in any conceivable way, you also legally committed the crime.

    This is one of the many ways this country persecutes black and brown people to feed the prison labor industry.










  • Listen, I understand what you’re saying. I can even sympathize with your position a bit.

    A few things, first, the right wing extremists do not care about facts, accuracy, or verifiability. They hear what they agree with and hoot and holler. The people who understand the game know this, and may offer some kind of source knowing that their audience is going to do absolutely no due diligence in verifying their claims. (See: Prager U)

    As a result, they can, and will, spew the most vile lies they think will be even remotely believable and this does not hurt their credibility with their audience. And, this is a real threat, more people are being radicalized every single day.

    Again, the people that understand the game know that the more egregious the lie, the more time we have to spend explaining why it’s wrong. And the people they’re trying to reach likely aren’t going to listen. Because it’s not a logical response they’re looking for, it’s an emotional one.

    What you’re doing is a form of devil’s advocacy. It’s not as constructive as I think you’re trying to be. Again, I get it. I’ve said the exact same things you’re saying. We left that world behind a long time ago. The time for rational, reasoned debate was before dollar store Mussolini was elected the first time. Honestly it was before Obama was dragged by the media for Dijon and a tan suit.

    We don’t live in a world where what you’re arguing for matters anymore.







  • For instance, the correlation between Tylenol and autism.

    Because there is a correlation. Tylenol is shown to be the most effective tool for combating fevers during pregnancy. And as it happens a high fever during pregnancy is also correlated with an increased incidence of autism. And since that was true prior to Tylenol existing, I’m sure if either of them has anything to do with it, it’s the fever.