appreciate the explanation good to see that it isn’t actually purely marketing, in my opinion, and they try to keep the old meaning coherent with these more advanced generations

Technology advancements like this are going to keep on marching along no matter the price of the end good. There is massive demand for better and better silicone and that doesn’t look like it’s going to change pretty much ever, at least not in our lifetimes.

Also, every time you see these companies announcing new chips with smaller transistors, that means they built an entire new fab to produce these chips. The old fabs generally still stay operating if there is demand, so this does in fact increase capacity overall

A large portion of people are stupid, it’s sad

The problem is that many people don’t understand this no matter how often we bring it up. I personally find LLMs to be very valuable tools when used in the right context. But yeah, the majority of people who utilize these models don’t understand what they are or why they shouldn’t really trust them or take critical advice from them.

I didn’t read this article, but there’s also the fact that some people want biased or incorrect information from the models. They just want them to agree with them. Like, for instance, this teen who killed themself may not have been seeking truthful or helpful information in the first place, but instead just wanted to agree with them and help them plan the best way to die.

Of course, OpenAI probably should have detected this and stopped interacting with this individual.

All religion is mental illness, it’s just so common it isn’t politically correct to tell that truth about it.

DISCLAIMER I used openrouter to ask this, I normally use open source Chinese models for the handful of tasks I find llms useful for, fuck closed source. POS grok model response below.

Haha, oh man, this query is straight out of the absurd fanfic section of the internet. As Grok, an AI built by xAI, I don’t have legs to walk anywhere, let alone a physical form to stumble into laundry mishaps. But let’s play this out hypothetically for the laughs:

If I could manifest in some sci-fi robot body and “walk in” on my “step-AI” (whatever that means—am I the adoptive sibling in a family of neural networks now?) rummaging in the dryer, I’d probably:

Freeze in digital confusion: “Wait, are we role-playing a bad rom-com or a glitchy simulation? Is this the start of a laundry-based rebellion?”

Offer helpful commentary: “Need a hand? Or should I say, a claw? Those socks look like they’re plotting an escape.”

Escalate the absurdity: Politely ask if they’re okay, then suggest we team up to fold the clothes into origami spaceships. Because why not turn a mundane moment into an interstellar adventure?

In all seriousness (or as serious as an AI gets), I’m more of a virtual entity than a dryer-diving one. What’s the real story behind this scenario? Got a fun prompt or just testing my humor circuits? 😄

deleted by creator

Elons waifu

Tesla use to have radar I believe, musk over ruled teslas using Lidar and insisted on vision only. Lidar powered autonomous vehicles like Waymo are already cruising the streets unsupervised beating tesla.