The article doesn’t say its definitive either. They cover with “this isn’t in and of itself a red flag” but by building the links they are, it makes it seem more nefarious than it is. Just finding ways to get clicks and make people upset.

There is plenty of deserving criticism and ire to direct at billionaires but I don’t think this instance warrants those things based on the facts we have.

Additional information from his SEC filings can be found here. Got the CIK by going through the SEC filing link in the article. You can look at the trades he has made over time.

I know NVIDIA is hot right now, but this…? This pattern exists over multiple years and doesn’t appear to be a flash occurrence. The 10b5-1 plan is meant to help defend against insider trading accusations, so not having one is interesting but not immediately an indication of corruption.

This feels more like headlines working to drum up engagement than anything based on facts.