Viagra is cheap on the black market.

At least they taste better than most testicles I’ve had in my mouth before.

Unfun fact! Carter tried to establish community mental health care centers across America, but Reagan immediately undid it.

Yeah, I’m stupid.

I’m so stupid I don’t understand how to more clearly state that no money should be required in exchange for permission to live here. It should not be a rental property. No profits should be made.

Can you understand my point now?

I see, you want things to be even worse for the poor so they can have a revolution faster.

If we allow spaces like OP’s article to be the new bare minimum for rentable space, then that’s what corps will rent at apartment prices. It won’t bring the cost of housing down, it’ll just be another way to funnel money from the poor into the pockets of the rich, and people will die in the process. If you support that, you’re licking boots.

The empathy here is not forgetting that people died for those laws. I understand that people would rather risk death than be homeless, but going back to tenement halls is not the answer.

I agree the record and bail are bullshit, but you cannot seriously be proposing that we relax fire code for rentals.

It’s not ‘livable’ in terms of building code. We could allow spaces like this to be used as bedrooms, but that would require doing away with the laws that say you need fire egress in bedrooms.

Right? We’re gonna use drones to kill unarmed kids, without the expense of having to ship stuff to a different country. It’s like a 60% off coupon for your favorite hobby, Uncle Sam is creaming himself in anticipation.

It sorta feels like they hit ‘AOC was a bartender’ and then Pavlov kicked in and they started drooling.

Okay, ty

I’m just confused because somebody said “it’s not important he was a gardner, it’s important that he’s unqualified”, and you jumped in with a “I disagree, its important he’s not qualified” and I’m just lost.

Like, are you saying its important to focus on his lack of qualifications, or are you saying you disagree with that?

You say your point and their point are different, and I’m not seeing the differences? From my end, it looks like you’re saying the same thing, just with different words.

I’mma quote from the post you responded to, maybe you can help me see what I’m missing.

…I guess my point is that gardening and entry-level-grocery are completely fine and expected experience for a 22 year old; but that no 22 year old could have the experience to do well as a leader in terror prevention. So, there’s a distinction between criticizing the absence of experience (justified), vs criticizing someone for having actual experience in an unrelated field (bullshit).

Where does your argument contradict that?

I’m confused, this reads like an argument, but you’re making the same point.

Another complication that often gets left out is that there’s even a type of diabetes that has nothing to do with insulin or blood sugar, but vasopressin. It’s far more rare, but people with that won’t be helped with diet either, so it’s worth a mention.

I used to work at a junkie hotel. I think you’re the one here that’s only seen junkies on television.