fizzle

Its a checks and balances type legal thing.

WMD was at least plausible.

This time they can’t even point to something.

Bibi has the kompromat.

If Bibi has a problem, Trump has a problem.

I just feel that things and places are tainted by horrific events that are associated with them, even if there’s a much more vanilla history.

As an example, the park at Bondi Beach in Australia where there was recently a terrorist massacre. It will always be the place where that happened, not the place where 10s of thousands of picnics were had.

Yes you can say that Kirk’s tent is a celebration of his life and his passion, but lots of people will find that to be in poor taste.

Everything about these people is creepy and weird. Before this guy died, I didn’t know who he was, but if I had I would have thought that making a living going to universities and manipulating people into signing up to this ideology was creepy and weird. His wife weirds me out too.

Well given that specific scene occurred in his normal setup it’s the same thing?

Like the car JFK was sitting in when he was assassinated is not just a normal car after that event.