In his summing up the judge said “It has been proven that sexual intercourse took place at a time that she was in a state that meant that she couldn’t possibly consent to it. The offence is serious and unacceptable.”
Wow, we can both read! That’s awesome. Now one of us just has to work on their comprehension and maybe even finish the article next time…
The conviction will not appear on the man’s criminal record. However, if he reoffends, he will be sentenced for this rape as well as for the new offence.
Why wait to be proven wrong? I don’t understand. Rapists shouldn’t be doctors.
It’s funny that the court would explicitly legitimize the idea that some people deserve to be “socially impaired” and others do not despite committing exactly the same crime.
Funny in the sense that it contradicts the entire foundation that the legal system is based on and makes the court look illegitimate and deliberately corrupt.
Wow, what an undemocratic shithole. I wonder if he’ll preemptively pardon any of his cabinet’s companies.
Yeah, my grandma was born in 1931. She’s still alive; she has pretty bad dementia now, but when I was a teenager she didn’t trust the government either.
That’s hilarious. F*** 47 indeed. I’m Canadian, tell Hegseth I got the clear, direct message.
“Because my mother-in-law’s not calling, come on, your mother, 80-year-olds, 90-year-olds, they trust the government.”
Literally anyone who is relying on those funds because they don’t have a pension or savings will be wondering where the fuck it is when it doesn’t get deposited on time.
It’s also laughable to suggest that old people trust the government en masse; a lot of those people were anti-government back in the day and probably didn’t change much. My own parents are nearly 70, they definitely don’t trust the government.
“He’s not racist, it’s just that I taught him that he was superior to every black person that he ever met as a child.” Fucking hell.
The US has almost 775,000 homeless people according to January 2024 data, which are more than likely underestimating the full scale of the issue. I doubt those people have the privilege of sheds. Doesn’t that make the US worse?
“Outside of homeless people” is such crazy goalpost-moving rhetoric when the conversation is about people in extreme poverty.
What does it help you with? I can definitely see having snippets or “modular” code on hand as being useful, but you don’t really need a LLM for that. What sets it apart? Is there a big time commitment necessary to get to the desired outputs or does it just do what you want right away?
Something tells me that they are not publishing his name because they’re betting that his future patients would feel differently. I would not want to see Dr. Rapist for any reason, even if he’s the best physician in the city.