Here’s to hoping there’s a causal link between the invite and one’s eventual fate.

Risky move, considering how Kristi Noem treats dogs

Bit late for that in’nit

Tbh David Brooks definitely has that “I enjoy inviting the neighborhood children over for storytime in my naked puzzle basement” aesthetic going on

So like… who at LG thought that was an efficient use of resources…? That seems a liiiiiitle bit wasteful.

This is the tiniest of tiny pp energies

I would genuinely celebrate his death by any cause whatsoever

I feel like you’re looking for a fight, but I don’t disagree. I blame the idiocy and myopicism of my countrymen, too.

Hey Hillary, do you know what I’d like to hear from you?

Nothing. Absolutely fucking nothing. You fucking lost to the fascist the first time around and paved the way for his ascent to power. You are a HUGE fucking factor in how we got to where we are now.

Then the shareholders shouldn’t hold shares in that bank. Simple as.

W…wow. That’s uh… huh.

She’s about to find out:

• it’s not a new issue, and orangeboi is using this simply as a political target of opportunity to pander to the Nationalist Christians
• why JK Rowling (amongst many others on many different topics throughout recent history) should have just shut the fuck up instead of sharing her shit opinions

On one hand: for me, as an aisle-seat-preferer, the draw of a window seat is simply not having a meatbag on both sides of me.

On the other hand: yeah it’s definitely false advertising.

Damn you’re right I should think about cutting out avocado toast and lattes

GTFO boomer

No, because you’re a sanctimonious asshole who thinks they’re automatically better than other people because of a belief that you have. A belief, I should add, that would be wildly different had you been born in, say, Cairo of Hangzhou or Bangkok, or any number of other cities with religious traditions outside of Christianity.

Oooh, nice, we’ve gone straight from a holier-than-thou categorical rejection of the concept of moral relativism to an attempt to use a straw man fallacy involving the Holocaust to categorically settle the entire scope of a topic that has been debated by philosophers smarter than either you or I for literal millennia.

Yes. Yes it does. The bounds of what society considers acceptable or reprehensible changes with time, location, and culture.