In his summing up the judge said “It has been proven that sexual intercourse took place at a time that she was in a state that meant that she couldn’t possibly consent to it. The offence is serious and unacceptable.”
Not interested in debating this. It’s obvious that someone with much more experience and education in this field disagreed with you even though he stupidly decided not to punish the perpetrator.
You’re presuming a lot here. I’m just not interested in debate because I don’t care to convince you of what I believe or be convinced.
You don’t get a judgement against you if you aren’t a rapist, and I think rapists shouldn’t be doctors. I don’t want to waste my time talking in circles trying to make you see it from my view because you seem to think his eventual MD cancels out his rape of another person.
Not interested in debating this. It’s obvious that someone with much more experience and education in this field disagreed with you even though he stupidly decided not to punish the perpetrator.
“He’s clever when he agrees with me, so you’re stupid, but stupid when he doesn’t.”
No. You’re not interested in debating this because you’ve jumped to conclusions and you’re neither reading nor thinking.
You’re presuming a lot here. I’m just not interested in debate because I don’t care to convince you of what I believe or be convinced.
You don’t get a judgement against you if you aren’t a rapist, and I think rapists shouldn’t be doctors. I don’t want to waste my time talking in circles trying to make you see it from my view because you seem to think his eventual MD cancels out his rape of another person.