So secure was the annual contest to fill three director and four officer positions that when one trustee lost his cryptographic key to unlock the results, the error made it impossible.
So secure was the annual contest to fill three director and four officer positions that when one trustee lost his cryptographic key to unlock the results, the error made it impossible.
Conspiracy time: Trustee #3 “lost” their key because polling suggested that they wouldn’t like the results.
I have no reason to believe that’s actually the case, but it’s interesting that the org uses a 3 key system to prevent collusion between trustees, but didn’t think about how this might enable lone-trustee sabotage.