I voted for her in 24 and I was glad to. I’m sorry she lost. But I don’t think it’s wise she run for President again in 28. Governor of California? Great. Let California decide. But the stakes are too high for the Presidency.
If we had a fair primary process, one where funding/media coverage wasn’t deliberately skewed like in 2016, I wouldn’t mind her running. I need to fact check myself on the details here, though — can’t remember if it was media coverage and funding or just media coverage in particular biasing Clinton
Ninja edit: ok there was some fuckery for sure, but I didn’t realize the votes were so heavily favoring Clinton. Either way, that’s what primaries are for. I’d rather have Harris over Newsome, personally
I voted for her in 24 and I was glad to. I’m sorry she lost. But I don’t think it’s wise she run for President again in 28. Governor of California? Great. Let California decide. But the stakes are too high for the Presidency.
If we had a fair primary process, one where funding/media coverage wasn’t deliberately skewed like in 2016, I wouldn’t mind her running. I need to fact check myself on the details here, though — can’t remember if it was media coverage and funding or just media coverage in particular biasing Clinton
Ninja edit: ok there was some fuckery for sure, but I didn’t realize the votes were so heavily favoring Clinton. Either way, that’s what primaries are for. I’d rather have Harris over Newsome, personally