• Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Did people not realise big tech has been largely subsidising the cost of AI usage in order to get people on-board?

    The cost was always going to go up eventually, and it will go up again because those “hyperscaling” data-centres cost a lot of money, and the investors want their money back and then some.

    • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Those “people” are executives, and no, they didn’t. Those fucking morons thought they could replace people, amd they tried first chance they got. This should be a wakeup call for everyone, everyone to unionize against these rich, greedy piles of shit literal morons.

    • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They weren’t hiding this information. OpenAI Burns $2.30 for every $1 they charge the customer. They want us to use LLMs for every facet of our lives so we have no choice when they crank the cost up.

  • Dave.@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 hours ago

    that has the potential to

    Of course it has “the potential to”, that’s the whole fucking point of this change.

    The compute hardware required to give you that obsequious-chatbot-on-demand is phenomenal. AI as a whole has been burning billions upon billions of dollars getting to these lofty heights where it’s alleged that everyone’s job is threatened, any day now.

    And now’s the time to get to the other side of the equation, the dreaded return on investment, where people have to pay what it actually costs. Plus a modest amount for that actual return of course, that’s the thing that all those investors actually want.

    Whether Microsoft has actually managed to get enough people hooked on the particular brand of crack they’re selling is questionable. In any case it’ll be fun to watch at least.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Plus a modest amount for the actual return

      Not sure it’s going to be all that modest. A lot of the data centres have been financed using debt, plus all the GPUs inside are depreciating hard, plus the rate needs to cover the cost of training and workforce, plus they won’t be running at 100% capacity all the time so they’ll need a bit extra to cover low-utilisation periods, plus this has been sold as the next big thing and the saviour of the world economy, so modest returns simply will not do.

      Not going to be so much “inference costs plus ten percent” as “starting at inference costs times ten”. Personally, can’t wait for the bubble to burst and the whole thing to collapse, but I’ve got my schadenfreude ready for when the big bills start to arrive.

  • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    They’re just trying to help developers reach the target Jensen Huang set, that developers should be spending half their salaries on tokens. Now you can do that so much more quickly.

    It’s how you build the biggest bubble.