Mark Rober just set up one of the most interesting self-driving tests of 2025, and he did it by imitating Looney Tunes. The former NASA engineer and current YouTube mad scientist recreated the classic gag where Wile E. Coyote paints a tunnel onto a wall to fool the Road Runner.

Only this time, the test subject wasn’t a cartoon bird… it was a self-driving Tesla Model Y.

The result? A full-speed, 40 MPH impact straight into the wall. Watch the video and tell us what you think!

  • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 day ago

    “But humans can do it with their eyes!” - says the man not selling a human brain to go with the optical sensors

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      “But humans can do it with their eyes!”

      The thing is, RADAR can see things humans can’t. There was a whole article a while back about a Model X that avoided an otherwise unavoidable accident by bouncing radar under the car in front of it and seeing that car slam on the brakes.

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I will point out that if you (or your camera-only driver assist) can’t stop without hitting the car in front of you when they slam on the breaks, then you’re driving too close to them… You really shouldn’t ever put yourself in a position where the person in front of you could cause you to unavoidably hit them.

        That said… Yeah, radar/lidar are far better than camera alone and there’s no good reason not to include them in the sensor suite unless you value profits over lives.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And I will point out that if the car in front of you isn’t paying attention and rams a stopped car in the middle of the road, you are fucked no matter what.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “But humans can do it with their eyes!”

      That’s the best part, they kinda can’t.
      There are videos from before they pulled the sensors of some pretty cool stuff where teslas slammed the breaks before anything visibly happened, based on lidar sensors sensing trouble a couple cars up the road, completely blocked to vision.

      super cool safety tech, and then they pulled it…

      one example here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIcC2ZMePKI

      • Rexios@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Pretty sure that wasn’t even lidar. It was radar which is even cheaper and pretty much every other new car has if they don’t have lidar.

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      The thing is, yes humans can do it with their eyes. But even with the giant amount of progressing power from the brain they are still not great at it.

      So of the ultimate goal is to the minimum/cheapest to be almost as good as human then yes, optical sensors only are enough.

      Of the goal is to prevent deaths and significantly reduce the number of accidents compared to then lidar is the best option.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Very interesting!

        What’s the payoff period, I wonder, assuming everyone could afford optical only before everyone could afford better tech.