A bill prohibiting Oklahoma lawmakers from drinking while on the job has been quite controversial.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    People really love an easy scapegoat to problems that are clearly caused by other factors.

    Now I don’t think drugs and other addictive items should be super cheap and readily available to everyone because that can encourage addiction and dependency (it’s why we have taxes and age limits) , but . Drug addiction is mostly a symptom, not a cause.

    I mean it can fuel a cycle. But it’s not the dominating factor.

    People are driven to drug addiction for reasons.

    Maybe addressing those reasons is harder than just banning a drug. But people will always want to self medicate.

    At least when it’s legal it’s regulated and safer.

    Oklahoma focusing on drug bans will just make people huff ethanol. Or spray paint. Or make moonshine which is way more potent.

    And it will allow criminals to flourish by selling the illegal goods that people want but can’t get the legal way.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This bill is simply making it so Oklahoma state lawmakers cannot drink while on the job. Which apparently is a problem.

      (Our First Lady has crashed two state vehicles under the influence. No blood test, no loss of license. Governors son was drinking and caught with guns he wasn’t supposed to have. There were no consequences.)

      • daannii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Well I was speaking more of the historic bans. But yeah. People shouldn’t be drinking while making contracts or signing laws