• NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      “The entire political spectrum” doesn’t mean “every single person ever,” or even “every single politician ever.” The implication is only that the statement applies to all political segments of the population. If the left, right and center (and any other significant political blocs) mostly agree on something, then the whole political spectrum supports it, even if some people don’t.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        12 hours ago

        That’s literally not what it means.

        There is people that oppose it. there is politicians that oppose it. The entire political spectrum isn’t discrete. It’s a spectrum. That’s literally what a spectrum means.

        • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I was inclined to agree with you but he has a point. The entire spectrum supports it, not everybody in said spectrum needs to support it for the statement to be true.

        • cockmushroom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The point is not that sSf(s) and g(s) | f(s)∈[0,1] and g(s)∈[0,1], it’s that y[0,1]h(y)∈S

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            you know you finally demonstrated a reasonable use for the keys on the number row (i prefer tenkey for numbers anyways) and coding in logic ascii would be perfect. i just need to make myself some keycaps. and the library with the 3d printer is just a 7 hour bikeride away…