• VAK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s the next gen sms, with features to bring it closer to parity with popular messaging apps

    • carrylex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Ok so RCS is basically WhatsApp/Signal but Google(+Carriers) but retarded:

      • The client software is propiertary and screws you over when you e.g. root your phone
      • They finally realized that E2EE exists - 10 years after everyone else implemented it
      • You can’t view the docs unless you’re a Google Partner
      • The protocol seems to be a mess
      • You need a mobile data connection for it to work (sometimes not)
      • Knowbody knows how the server software works or can be hosted, everything is “Google Jibe” or needs to connect to it to work
      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        14 hours ago

        whatsApp […] But retarded

        Huh? That’s literally a Meta platform… Doesn’t get much worse than that. I’d sooner just use SMS

        • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          AFAIK this is SMS… Well, they are using RCS to hijack it. So you start SMS conversation and if both parties have it enabled or will switch to their protocol. Kind of what iMessage does.

          Yeah, I keep RCS disabled on my phone and preferably would replace it with another app, but didn’t know a good alternative.

        • Mountaineer@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          What messaging service works without a data connection?

          mobile data connection.

          As opposed to wifi or the pigeons you linked.

      • matlag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago
        • GOS will code a proprietary client, like Whatsapp? I doubt…
        • It’s E2E with 3 ends, the 3rd one being Meta, like Whatsapp?
        • There is no doc available, like Whatsapp?
        • The server is as closed as one can be like Whatsapp?

        Frankly, if one actor gets in RCS and gives me confidence it’s going to be secure and respect our privacy as much as can be, it’s GOS.
        RCS might be below some other standards, but phone messaging is still a thing. GOS is not about idealistic massive adoption of Signal, it’s about what’s needed in the day-to-day life, but with privacy and security.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I think it’s texts for people who don’t use Signal or WhatsApp, so… nobody I have ever met, I guess

      • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I am suprised that it took this long to find someone that mentions how RCS will need to fight the network effect of pre existing IM apps thanks to no one using SMS in 2026 (for good reason, it is genuinely garbage and unsafe)

      • lordziv@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It is literally a standardized communication protocol. That is what iMessage is

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        You’re correct. EU users didn’t adopt, or at least continue to utilize, SMS based messaging like users in the US did. This is not a problem for anyone using web based messaging like the ones you mentioned.

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’m quite surprised by the reaction this comment has received, are Americans genuinely still using SMS? Don’t they need to have group chats, send pictures, transfer files, make audio and video calls, or make use of encryption?

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Sounds like you haven’t met anyone. Or more likely, it’s everyone not-you who is weird.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I have and I’m not sure I get your point. I have an ability to understand how other people use technology. Which is aided by travel, not hindered by it.

        • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          sounds like you live in the land of the free, I mean the land of forced to use SMS becausd apple NPCs can’t be bothered to use a proper IM service

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Genuinely nobody I know has sent an SMS message for at least a decade, who are you still sending SMS to in this day and age when internet-based messengers exist?

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Ever heard of older people or just less techy ones? Guess not. I always find it weird when people get on some high horse about sms or any other tech topic. By the way you talk, one would think you literally think hundreds of millions or more people don’t use a texting capability built-in to their phone. But you clearly don’t think that. You apparently just have a need to “other” people who do use it.

            Ps. You live in a world where people still use fax machines, checks, floppy disks, and AOL over dialup. People use old tech. It’s not that crazy and much of it has to do with older people not liking change.

            • smeg@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Look, I’m not trying to be a smartarse here, I’m genuinely interested in different ways people use technology. I am telling you that every person I know, regardless of age, defaults to using WhatsApp for communications; even my elderly relatives.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Ok, perhaps I misjudged you. For me, even younger people typically don’t use other messengers besides sms. I’ve only ever successfully gotten like 5 people to install signal. The other most popular messengers in the us, Facebook messenger and Whatsapp, are probably much worse for privacy than sms, due to meta ownership.

                • smeg@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Yeah I’ve got about half of my friends and family using Signal, but when even a single one refuses then the whole group chat ends up staying in WhatsApp. WhatsApp does at least seem better than Facebook messenger though, as it allegedly implements the Signal protocol so should still be E2E encrypted. “Allegedly”, because it’s closed source and run by the trustworthy philanthropists as Facebook who I’m sure are data mining as much as they can from it, but I think people would have found out if it was a total lie. Still better than SMS though which may as well be public.

                  Where in the world are you? I speak for the UK when I talk about WhatsApp being the de-facto messenger. How do people do group chats or send files if they’re still using SMS?

                  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    35 minutes ago

                    Well, yeah, Whatsapp is e2e encrypted but also I’m pretty sure it’s known that the app can/does use chat data on the client side. If they aren’t doing that, they could always start someday because for the conversations to be readable they are decrypted on the device end for each user. And I would put nothing past Meta.

                    I’m in the US. Group chats infamously have this “green/blue bubble” issue where many iPhone users would have a group chat (automatically using iMessage) and then if an android user gets added, the chat gets downgraded to MMS I think and the android user shows as a green bubble. It’s a weird cultural thing where the iPhone users (as designed by apple) think the android user has a crappy phone because they designed their ecosystem like that. I am sure overall many people use non-sms apps but it’s pretty rare for someone to assume I use Whatsapp, they typically ask first. And people using signal is also rare ime. But I’m sure all this would be much different for younger people than me. I know Snapchat is still pretty popular and I’ve barely used it (hated it).